What should be done when fuel does not permit landing at the intended field during single runway operations?

When fuel does not permit landing at the intended field during single runway operations, diverting to an alternate field is the most prudent course of action. This ensures the safety of the aircraft and its occupants by allowing for a landing at a location where the fuel situation can be managed appropriately.

Diverting to an alternate field provides several advantages, including the opportunity to land without the added stress of low fuel levels, the ability to access better facilities and services than may be available at the intended field, and adherence to established safety protocols. It allows for effective management of potential emergencies by choosing a location with adequate fuel reserves, alternative routes, and possibly more favorable weather conditions.

In contrast, other options suggest risky or potentially dangerous actions. Landing regardless of fuel levels (the first option) could lead to fuel exhaustion mid-flight, risking both the landing and overall aircraft safety. Reducing power to extend fuel usage (the third option) may seem beneficial in theory but could result in a further loss of control over the situation, potentially leading to an inability to reach the intended or alternate landing site. Requesting a direct return to base (the fourth option) might be impractical if the current fuel levels make it impossible to safely reach the base without diverting to an